Go to content Go to navigation Go to search

Advocacy

November 21, 2006

Sunshine for Smithsonian/Showtime

By Robert Townsend

The Smithsonian Institution is trying to sweep its secret contract with Showtime under a Congressional rug, according to Carl Malamud at the Center for American Progress. Malamud reports that “Smithsonian lobbyists are trying to paper over their exclusive 30-year sellout to Showtime, saying that the contract has posed no problems and nobody seems to be upset about it anymore.”

Writing on behalf of the Association, President Linda Kerber questioned the closed and secretive nature of the arrangement with Showtime back in May. Though there was a Congressional hearing, and the Smithsonian was punished by having funds deleted from its budget, the issue largely disappeared from public view. Staff at the Smithsonian even managed to get the record from the one Congressional hearing on the issue removed from the Government Printing Office website, because it included some text from the contract. (Thanks to Carl Malamud the text is still available here.)

Anyone interested keeping the pressure on Smithsonian to live up to its obligations as a public institution is encouraged to sign onto a letter to members of Congress, prepared by Malamud and the Center before November 25.

  1. I simply object to the secrecy and the 30 year term. Why cannot this arrangement be explained and debated in public?


    Michael Spencer    Nov 28, 11:06 PM   


  2. University of Iowa
    Iowa City, Iowa


    — Jennifer Rebecca Harbour    Nov 29, 11:58 AM   


  3. As a former employee of the Smithsonian Institution (1983-1994), I mourn the SI Regents’ turn toward corporate models after Robert McCormick Adams’term ended. The Institution has never been the same.
    Jacki Rand


    — Jacki Rand, Ph.D.    Nov 29, 12:52 PM   


  4. We are still upset about it. The Smithsonian is a public trust, not to be compromised by an exclusive relationship with a commercial enterprise—and certainly not in a procedure shrouded in secrecy.


    — Elizabeth Heineman    Nov 29, 05:20 PM   


  5. The effort to “privatize” history that this represents is incompatible with remaining a civilized nation.


    — Katherine H Tachau    Nov 30, 07:20 PM